bitmessage/Jabit
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Minor refactoring

Browse Source 
I think having the read method in the same place as the write method might help preventing some errors
There are some people who are strictly against using static methods. I suppose I'm not experienced enough yet.
This commit is contained in:
Christian Basler
2015-04-18 16:17:37 +02:00
parent 2cd857dd36
commit 51c1ecfd41
15 changed files with 116 additions and 58 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
domain/src/test/java/ch/dissem/bitmessage/utils/SecurityTest.java
View File

@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ import ch.dissem.bitmessage.ports.MultiThreadedPOWEngine;
import org.junit.Test;
import javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter;
import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.security.KeyPairGenerator;
import java.util.Calendar;
@@ -71,8 +72,8 @@ public class SecurityTest {
public void testProofOfWorkFails() throws IOException {
ObjectMessage objectMessage = new ObjectMessage.Builder()
.nonce(new byte[8])
.expiresTime(300 + (System.currentTimeMillis() / 1000)) // 5 minutes
.payload(new GenericPayload(1, new byte[0]))
.expiresTime(UnixTime.now() + 300) // 5 minutes
.payload(GenericPayload.read(new ByteArrayInputStream(new byte[0]), 1, 0))
.build();
Security.checkProofOfWork(objectMessage, 1000, 1000);
}
@@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ public class SecurityTest {
ObjectMessage objectMessage = new ObjectMessage.Builder()
.nonce(new byte[8])
.expiresTime(expires.getTimeInMillis() / 1000)
.payload(new GenericPayload(1, new byte[0]))
.payload(GenericPayload.read(new ByteArrayInputStream(new byte[0]), 1, 0))
.build();
Security.doProofOfWork(objectMessage, new MultiThreadedPOWEngine(), 1000, 1000);
Security.checkProofOfWork(objectMessage, 1000, 1000);