Fixed an issue in the POW engine
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f05af8bb7
commit
07b349563f
@ -101,14 +101,12 @@ public class MultiThreadedPOWEngine implements ProofOfWorkEngine {
|
|||||||
if (!Bytes.lt(target, mda.digest(mda.digest()), 8)) {
|
if (!Bytes.lt(target, mda.digest(mda.digest()), 8)) {
|
||||||
synchronized (callback) {
|
synchronized (callback) {
|
||||||
if (!Thread.interrupted()) {
|
if (!Thread.interrupted()) {
|
||||||
try {
|
|
||||||
callback.onNonceCalculated(initialHash, nonce);
|
|
||||||
} finally {
|
|
||||||
semaphore.release();
|
|
||||||
for (Worker w : workers) {
|
for (Worker w : workers) {
|
||||||
w.interrupt();
|
w.interrupt();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
// Clear interrupted flag for callback
|
||||||
|
Thread.interrupted();
|
||||||
|
callback.onNonceCalculated(initialHash, nonce);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
@ -129,8 +127,10 @@ public class MultiThreadedPOWEngine implements ProofOfWorkEngine {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
@Override
|
@Override
|
||||||
public void onNonceCalculated(byte[] initialHash, byte[] nonce) {
|
public void onNonceCalculated(byte[] initialHash, byte[] nonce) {
|
||||||
|
// Prevents the callback from being called twice if two nonces are found simultaneously
|
||||||
synchronized (this) {
|
synchronized (this) {
|
||||||
if (waiting) {
|
if (waiting) {
|
||||||
|
semaphore.release();
|
||||||
LOG.info("Nonce calculated in " + ((System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime) / 1000) + " seconds");
|
LOG.info("Nonce calculated in " + ((System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime) / 1000) + " seconds");
|
||||||
waiting = false;
|
waiting = false;
|
||||||
callback.onNonceCalculated(initialHash, nonce);
|
callback.onNonceCalculated(initialHash, nonce);
|
||||||
|
@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ import static ch.dissem.bitmessage.utils.Bytes.inc;
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
* You should really use the MultiThreadedPOWEngine, but this one might help you grok the other one.
|
* You should really use the MultiThreadedPOWEngine, but this one might help you grok the other one.
|
||||||
|
* <p>
|
||||||
|
* <strong>Warning:</strong> implementations probably depend on POW being asynchronous, that's
|
||||||
|
* another reason not to use this one.
|
||||||
|
* </p>
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
public class SimplePOWEngine implements ProofOfWorkEngine {
|
public class SimplePOWEngine implements ProofOfWorkEngine {
|
||||||
@Override
|
@Override
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user